Tahlequah Daily Press

Sports

July 30, 2012

North Korean lifts 3 times body weight for gold

LONDON — It was a big record for a little guy.

North Korea's Om Yun Chol, all of 5 feet and 123 pounds, won a gold medal by confidently lifting an Olympic record 370 pounds in the clean and jerk Sunday at the London Games.

That was more than three times his body weight, something only a handful of others have ever done.

How unlikely was the upset victory?

Om was in the "B'' group with lower-ranked competitors and lifted weights of 160 and 165 kilograms on his first two attempts early in the day. He got the crowd roaring when it was announced he would go for 168 kilograms — the Olympic record.

"I wanted to lift a big weight and make the other athletes nervous," Om said.

It worked.

As the "A'' group entered the platform later Sunday, double world champion and pre-competition favorite Wu Jiangbiao of China lifted 133 kilograms in the snatch to gain an 8-kilogram lead over Om.

But Wu's 156-kilogram clean and jerk wasn't enough to beat the North Korean's total of 293 kilograms, and he had to settle for the silver. European champion Valentin Hristov of Azerbaijan got the bronze.

Om's successful lift broke the mark of 167 kilograms set by Halil Mutlu of Turkey in Sydney in 2000.

Among the few lifters who have cleared three times their body weight are Mutlu and Naim Suleymanoglu, also of Turkey, known as the "Pocket Hercules."

Om gave all the credit to Kim Jong Il, the North Korean leader who died last year.

"How can any man possibly lift 168kg?" Om was as saying by the internal Olympic News Service. "I believe the great Kim Jong Il looked over me."

North Korean athletes have routinely praised Kim and the North Korean people whenever they win gold medals.

Also Sunday, North Korea got its first gold medal of the London Games when An Kae Um defeated Acosta Bermoy of Cuba in the women's judo 52-kilgram category.

Text Only
Sports
Poll

What do you think of Sen. McCain's proposal to allow cable TV channels to be sold a la carte (individually, rather than in bundles with a lot of channels no one wants)? Bear in mind some less popular channels could go by the wayside with no bundling support, and that while overall packages should theoretically decrease in cost, individual channels might cost more.

Strongly in favor of a la carte.
Somewhat in favor of a la carte.
Somewhat opposed to a la carte.
Strongly opposed to a la carte.
Undecided
     View Results
Press Sports Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
AP Video
Probe Begins After Conn. Commuter Trains Crash NTSB Begins Investigation Into Conn. Train Crash Lotto Fever Sweeps the Country Conn. Commuter Trains Collide; 60 Go to Hospital Coffee Run Leads to Hatchet Hitchhiker Arrest Fmr. IRS Head Insists No Politics in Targeting CDC: Fecal Bacteria Common in Swimming Pools $1 Million in Jewels Stolen at Cannes Film Fest NM Mom Chases Down Child Abductor Raw: Crash Sends Car Into Fla. Pool Raw: Obama Sits Down With Elementary Kids Raw: Bear Falls From Tampa Tree Ousted IRS Chief: Errors Not Caused by Politics Terror Suspect Due in Court in Idaho Friday Raw: Driver Ejected From Truck, Over Bridge Could Tobacco Be the Next Biofuel? Wash. State Releases Draft Rules for Legal Pot Dying Man's Blinks Lead to Murder Conviction Officials: Texas Tornado Likely Had 200 Mph Wind Brothers Arrested in NOLA Parade Shooting
Stocks