Tahlequah Daily Press

Local News

November 13, 2008

'Mr. Crappie' sues man he says took his moniker

TAHLEQUAH DAILY PRESS — This fishing story is headed to court.

Lawrence A. Fulton filed suit Wednesday afternoon against Wally Marshall for the use of the “Mr. Crappie” name. Marshall’s principal place of business is in Garland, Texas, but he transacts business in Oklahoma.

Fulton sells angling equipment, supplies and goods in and around Fort Gibson. He states in the suit he’s been “Mr. Crappie” for more than 12 years, and his business is named “Mr. Crappie Bait and Tackle.” Fulton developed logos incorporating himself and his business a month before opening.

The suit states Fulton has never abandoned use of the name. He sells hats, T-shirts and pencils and buys advertising under the “Mr. Crappie” moniker.

Fulton alleges he gave Marshall a business card emblazoned with “Mr. Crappie” and the “Mr. Crappie Bait and Tackle” name at an event at the Bass Pro Shop in Springfield, Mo., in October 1996.

The suit indicates Marshall filed an application for trademark registration for “Mr. Crappie” in February 1998 and has been using the name on equipment, goods and supplies. Futon alleges this was done without consent and that Marshall has profited from use of the “Mr. Crappie” trademark.

Fulton is seeking judgment for trademark infringement, deceptive trade practices, common law trademark and trademark infringement, and unfair competition. He also asks the court to order the destruction of any goods Marshall has with the “Mr. Crappie” name, and for Marshall to contact all publications distributed or sold in Oklahoma containing Marshall’s “Mr. Crappie” advertisements to cancel any references to him as “Mr. Crappie.”

Fulton, who represents himself, wants Marshall to pay him all profits he has realized from sale of products using the “Mr. Crappie” trademark, damages in excess of $10,000, interest, court costs and other relief.

Local News

AP Video

Hyperlocal Search

Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Poll

The use of cell phones while driving is increasingly becoming an issue. What do you think about cell phone use by emergency personnel, like law enforcement officers, EMTs, firemen, etc.?

• If the law allows the common citizen to use cell phones while driving, emergency personnel should be able to also.
• Emergency personnel should be held to a higher standard. Since they are often driving faster than normal, they should not be allowed to use cell phones while driving, even if other citizens can.
• They should be allowed to use them like anyone else, but their host entities (hospitals, fire departments, cities, etc.) should carry extra insurance for this reason.
• Don't know.
     View Results