Tahlequah Daily Press

Breaking News

Local News

September 24, 2012

Restraining order issued in B&B case

TAHLEQUAH — A judge last week granted a temporary restraining order while litigation is pending among a group of Tahlequah property owners and the owner of a bed-and-breakfast operation.

Local resident Jack Reese and a dozen other property owners in a neighborhood near Garner Avenue, off of West Fourth Street, filed a request for the temporary order last June.

Homeowners said they ultimately want the court to place a permanent injunction against Cordelia Dixon’s bed-and-breakfast facility on Garner.

An order filed Thursday by Wagoner Judge Douglas Kirkley shows he considered the exhibits and reviewed the law before issuing the temporary restraining order against Dixon’s B&B.

Property owners opposed to Dixon’s bed-and-breakfast operation in their neighborhood argue a restrictive covenant in places since the 1960s prohibits the operation.

Kirkley found in their favor, saying violation of the covenant constitutes “irreparable harm.”

“Even though there may be other variances in the neighborhood (which is disputed), this court does not have evidence that the variance procedure written in the restrictive covenant wasn’t followed by others,” Kirkley’s order reads. “[Dixon’s] property is subject to the restrictive covenant which prevents a residence to be used as a business.”

Kirkley was assigned to the case in late August after Special District Judge Sandy Crosslin filed a recusal. Crosslin had been assigned to the case in July after Associate District Judge Mark Dobbins recused himself.

An order was also filed last week allowing Violisa Russell, one of the plaintiffs in the case against Dixon, to dismiss her claim with prejudice. Russell requested the dismissal of her claim, the order shows.

Click here to get the entire Tahlequah Daily Press delivered everyday to your home or office. Code for E-EDITION TRIAL OR SUBSCRIBE Click here to get a free trial or to subscribe to the Tahlequah Daily Press electronic edition.

It's the ENTIRE newspaper (without the paper) for your computer, iPad or e-reader.

Text Only
Local News
Poll

Should storm shelters be a mandatory part of construction in tornado-prone areas?

Yes, in all structures, whether they be public buildings or private homes and businesses.
Yes, but only in public buildings, like schools or stadiums; no for private homes and businesses.
No, storm shelters should not be mandatory, but perhaps government funds or grants should be available to those who choose to build them.
No, they should not be mandatory, and there should be no government funds for them.
Undecided.
     View Results
Press Sports Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
AP Video
Sheriff: No Sign Killing of 2 Kids Was Planned Obama Defends Drone Strikes, With Limits Raw: Jurors Deadlock on Jodi Arias Penalty Boy Scouts Decision "First Step" Say Activists Raw: Utah Teen Arrested in Death of His Brothers Closer Look at Okla. School Where Children Died Two Suspects in Murder Known to London Police Boy Scouts Mom Supports Gay Inclusiveness "Be Ready": NOAA Warns of Busy Hurricane Season SeaWorld: Penguins Are Coolest Thing in Florida Obama Renews Call to Close Gitmo Obama Offers Drone Strike Defense Raw: Heckler Interrupts Obama on Guantanamo A Slice of Apple History Up for Grabs
Stocks
Bedlam