Editor, Daily Press:
Two newspaper articles recently have brought to mind the parable of the five high-schoolers who approached their parents one February with an idea to form a car pool.
All were good students who also played varsity baseball. Though each rode the school bus in the morning, each was picked up after practice by his parents. The boys saw that by carpooling, each family’s car would make only one trip to/from the school each week. The parents thought this was a great idea, and to help out, they agreed to put a half-tank of gas in the family car each day their son was to drive for the first five weeks. But with the sixth week, each boy was to pay for his own gasoline from his $20 weekly allowance.
Things went well until the Saturday before the sixth week, when the boy who was to drive on Monday came to his parents for money to put gas in the family car. His parents reminded him of their agreement and asked him what happened to his money. He said he had had $20 on Friday when an announcement was made that the money from the school’s vending machines was going send the high school’s Teacher of the Year on a trip around the world. Since he knew the teacher, he spent $5 on candy bars. The other $15 he had was for a date that evening. He admitted he had not saved any of his earlier allowance ($80) to use for gas, but didn’t know what he had spent it on.
His parents reminded him he had a responsibility to them, to his friends, and to himself. So instead of a date. he was to put gas in the family car, which he did, and they helped him set up a budget before he got his next allowance. The moral of the story: By facing his responsibilities, the boy learned a valuable lesson in planning and budgeting.
I was at the school board meeting in September when the Boys & Girls Club resolution was presented, and to the accurate report I would add two comments. First, Mr. Spears explained the sales tax would “only” be 25 cents on a $100 purchase, and if a person didn’t want to pay the tax, he or she could shop elsewhere. He also said unless the city approves a five-year, 25 percent sales tax right away to support the BGC, some severe cuts, like “no summer program next year,” would have to be made. Dr. Goodsell said this sales tax would raise “about $350,000 a year.”
It would be easy to talk numbers. For example, Dr. Goodsell has said that once work at Heritage is done, it still will cost the school district $750,000 to open the doors. If the loss of $120,000 (12 percent of B&GC’s budget) in federal funding can jeopardize B&GC, why not delay the opening of Heritage School for six years? That $750,000 would fully match the loss of federal funding for the B&GC for six years, plus give the school administration (and board) time to develop budgets, which address all essential and desired school services.
The truth is, the second article, on the school resource officers, is the real alarm. It reminds us this problem with B&GC is not the first time the school board and administration have failed to meet their responsibilities. The SRO program, like the B&GC, began with a time-limited grant, which expired. Today it is funded for the most part, if not entirely, by the city.
I have great respect for the work of the school resource officers and the B&GC. They provide valuable services to our children. I admire those citizens who seek to serve their community by running for public office. But I take exception with elected officials and high-priced school administrators who, through their own neglect, now seek to get the community to pay for the programs they themselves are supposed to fund and oversee.
I urge the mayor and city council to tell the school board and administration to show where the money they got went; to explain how they all failed to plan for this end of federal funding; to find the money to pay for the B&GC from within the school budget; and to stop expecting the taxpayer to bail out the school board and administration.
It’s time to be responsible.
Editor, Daily Press:
- Letters to editor
Pray for leaders, too
Dave Thomas needs to be sure he is uttering facts, not claims, before he prays.
In defense of the 2nd
There are four reasons why I am against a mandated background check to purchase a weapon. The first is how I read the Second Amendment: “...shall not be infringed..” means that Congress does not have any authority over “arms.” I do not believe a body of fallible men and women should have that kind of authority.
STIR incensed at letters
Now we learn that not only have Northwest Arkansas forces successfully weaseled another study of Oklahoma’s
Foot patrol needed here
Folks are putting in [the Press] their pride for the police department. If all was so fine, why did we get a new chief?
Kudos to Daily Press
I just want to let you know how impressed I am with the professionalism displayed by Tahlequah Daily Press Managing Editor Kim Poindexter during a disturbing incident I witnessed Monday, April 1.
In defense of cops
One of my pet peeves is people talking about something as if it’s fact when they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about. In response to Phyllis Wilfong’s letter to the editor, let me set the record straight.
CN to be commended
I have to applaud Cherokee Nation’s investment in health care.
In appreciation of cops
Wow, maybe we should start dictating to our police force where, when, what time, what type of food, and with whom they should be eating! More often than not, co-workers are often seen lunching together. Why should law enforcement be looked upon any differently?
The unfriendly streets
I have lived in the Tahlequah area since 1994, and since 2009, within the city limits of Tahlequah. Since 2011, I have begun running in town, and since 2012, also started bicycling in town.
Coming full circle
When I was a child growing up in Tahlequah, the Indian children were looked down on. The “White” kids made fun of their names and accents.
- More Letters to editor Headlines
- Pray for leaders, too