Tahlequah Daily Press

Editorials

October 26, 2012

Care needed in addressing abortion issue

TAHLEQUAH — Aspiring politicians who want to effectively convey an anti-abortion message need to figure out a way to do it without offending the untold numbers of women who have been victims of rape.

Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock is the latest in a string of candidates to incite wrath with a statement that seemed to place the rights and dignity of a fetus over the traumatized woman.

Mourdock stands by his assertion that if a rape victim gets pregnant, it’s “something God intended.” He certainly didn’t intend to sound so callous; he was, as he later said when explaining why he wouldn’t apologize, “speaking from my heart.”

Politicians who want to present themselves as “pro-life” should know abortion is the most volatile, contentious topic they will likely face, and that the motives of those pressing for a definitive plank aren’t necessarily pure.

Those on the far right who would make abortion the only issue that counts will be looking for an uncompromising view in return for their support, while those on the far left may be trying to trap a candidate into sparking public outrage or making himself look foolish.

But neither of these groups are the majority, and don’t represent the conflicted and often heart-wrenching attitudes most Americans share on abortion.

A candidate should strive to provide thoughtful, nuanced answers that reassure anti-abortion advocates of his empathy for their position, while still making himself palatable to those who feel abortion should be available at least under certain circumstances.

Creating the impression that a pregnancy from rape – and by association, the rape itself - was “God’s will” is unwise both politically and morally.

The same can be said for the blunders made by other candidates who have recently struggled for a clear response to a complex question. Among the worst offenders were U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin, who claimed the female body can “shut that whole thing down” in cases of “legitimate rape”; and former presidential candidate Ron Paul, who recommended that the victim of an “honest rape” go straight to the emergency room, where she should get a shot of estrogen.

Those who strive valiantly to defend the dignity of the unborn should try to remember that while most Americans are anti-abortion in principal, the vast majority judge pregnancy resulting from rape or incest by a different standard.

The ultimate eradication of abortion, while a noble goal, is almost as unrealistic as the dream of eliminating spousal and child abuse, rape, incest, drunken debauchery and other social ills that sometimes lead to unwanted or crisis pregnancies.

Politicians and others who are truly pro-life acknowledge small triumphs in the ongoing battle are better than no victory at all. When they can help even one woman bring a crisis pregnancy to term through counseling, pre- and post-natal care and, yes, financial assistance for her and her baby, they’ve met with success.

But candidates can’t take up official arms in the battle unless they’re elected – and in some states, at least, they can’t win office if they seem to care more for a fetus than the woman who carries it in her womb.

Text Only
Editorials
  • Phone record debacle an insult to press

    Distrust of government secrecy has been elevated to an exceptional level with the disclosure the Justice Department covertly examined two months of Associated Press phone records to determine who leaked details to the AP about a foiled terrorist plot.

    May 17, 2013

  • Punishing the animal dumpers

    Animal dumping is not a problem unique to Cherokee County, but anyone who’s been keeping up with current events for the past decade or so will acknowledge it’s especially prevalent here.

    May 13, 2013

  • Openness on AG the right course

    It takes courage to admit to a serious mistake or a personal lapse, especially when the nature of the situation may call for a public mea culpa.

    May 10, 2013

  • Legislative action not encouraging

    It’s outrageous to advance the argument that it’s “fair” for Chesapeake Oil to wind up with a negative tax bill – lower than the average Oklahoman paid last year. Yet that’s precisely the message some of that company’s protectors in the state Legislature are trying to convey.

    May 6, 2013

  • Cast your ballot for ‘At Its Best’

    May has arrived, and that means folks will be relishing their upcoming trips over the Memorial Day weekend to Lake Tenkiller and the Illinois River. Before that, families with 12th-graders in their households will be making plans to watch their children make the monumental transition that graduation brings.

    May 3, 2013

  • Corporations shouldn’t have ‘people’ status

    Since the Supreme Court made its fateful 2010 decision in the Citizens United case, most Americans have come to agree with the cynical statement that “corporations aren’t people.” And most Americans – except that tiny fraction who wield all the power – would approve of a constitutional amendment to make it tougher to buy a congressman.

    May 1, 2013

  • Anti-texting bill still needs look

    A bill that would have banned texting while driving was shot down for the third and presumably final time this legislative session, and we can’t say we’re surprised.

    April 29, 2013

  • Red Fern a great family fun event

    By the time many of you read this, you’ll already be just hours away from milling around, or kicking back in your lawn chairs, at Norris Park. Some of you might already be downtown before your paper arrives.

    April 26, 2013

  • Progress set to print Sunday

    Sporadic readers will want to pick up a copy of the Sunday, April 21 Daily Press. It will contain the first “wave” of our annual Progress edition.

    April 19, 2013

  • Faking ‘evidence’ hurts their case

    Sometimes activists, in their determined attempts to advance cherished causes, can do more harm than good. That’s what could be happening in the case of the pit bulldog killed with an arrow by a local high school student.

    April 16, 2013

Poll

What do you think of Sen. McCain's proposal to allow cable TV channels to be sold a la carte (individually, rather than in bundles with a lot of channels no one wants)? Bear in mind some less popular channels could go by the wayside with no bundling support, and that while overall packages should theoretically decrease in cost, individual channels might cost more.

Strongly in favor of a la carte.
Somewhat in favor of a la carte.
Somewhat opposed to a la carte.
Strongly opposed to a la carte.
Undecided
     View Results
Press Sports Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
AP Video
Probe Begins After Conn. Commuter Trains Crash NTSB Begins Investigation Into Conn. Train Crash Lotto Fever Sweeps the Country Conn. Commuter Trains Collide; 60 Go to Hospital Coffee Run Leads to Hatchet Hitchhiker Arrest Fmr. IRS Head Insists No Politics in Targeting CDC: Fecal Bacteria Common in Swimming Pools $1 Million in Jewels Stolen at Cannes Film Fest NM Mom Chases Down Child Abductor Raw: Crash Sends Car Into Fla. Pool Raw: Obama Sits Down With Elementary Kids Raw: Bear Falls From Tampa Tree Ousted IRS Chief: Errors Not Caused by Politics Terror Suspect Due in Court in Idaho Friday Raw: Driver Ejected From Truck, Over Bridge Could Tobacco Be the Next Biofuel? Wash. State Releases Draft Rules for Legal Pot Dying Man's Blinks Lead to Murder Conviction Officials: Texas Tornado Likely Had 200 Mph Wind Brothers Arrested in NOLA Parade Shooting
Stocks
Bedlam