Most folks assume journalists revel in political campaign season. After all, the candidates provide plenty of grist for the mill and ink for the pulp, and we’re here to get that information out the people. And if the people are reading the papers and listening to the news, they ought to be well-informed enough to make rational decisions at the polls, right?
Wrong on both counts. Some of us actually get as tired of reporting it as you all do of reading it.
At some point, many folks give up reading and listening, because they’ve ultimately concluded - correctly - that 95 percent of what spews from the maws of politicians is either nonsense or lies of a magnitude that set Ol’ Slewfoot grinning from horn to horn. While covering stump speeches and debates, most legitimate journalists are not as much afraid of misquoting a politician as they are of embarrassing themselves by vomiting uncontrollably onto their notepads or microphones.
The illegitimate journalists – who are not journalists at all, but biased public relations shills for special interests – thrive in this environment as they wax forth with their propaganda. But still, sensible folks tune them out and turn the channel to something more credible like, say, a reality show. The ones who buy into the claptrap of the unfair and unbalanced media stooges may keep watching and even believing, but they aren’t any better informed than their savvier friends.
I know these things because lately, I’ve been answering a lot of what once would have been labeled “stupid questions” about politicians. And I’ve witnessed scenes that also prove many people believe they’ll never know the truth about candidates, so why waste time with attempted discernment?
Last week, while at the junction of U.S. 62 and Rayne, I noticed a group of young people (some scantily clad), waving signs that declared, “Honk for Paul!” I didn’t hear any responsive blasts during my brief stint in the left-turn lane, but I did see a guy in a truck pull over and speak to one of the kids.
A few minutes later, while in the produce department at Reasor’s, I recognized the guy who had stopped, and I overheard a conversation involving him and a couple of women in their late 60s or early 70s.
“I wonder what church it was?” one of the ladies was saying.
“I don’t know, but I just think it’s so wonderful that a youth group would be out there publicly proclaiming the gospel,” the other one said. “That one little girl wasn’t wearing much, but at least she wasn’t hiding her ‘Christian’ light under a bushel, either.”
That’s when the fellow in the truck interjected, “Oh, they weren’t a church group. They were out there stumping for that guy who’s running for president.”
“What guy?” the second woman asked.
“You know, that Rand or Ron Paul, or whoever he is,” said the guy.
“Oh, bless me!” the second woman said. “I feel so silly – I honked! I thought they were talking about the apostle!”
“You think YOU feel silly,” the guy told her. “I thought I was gonna get my truck washed for cheap.”
I’ve had similar phone calls at the office. Wednesday, a woman called to ask, “Is this Newt Gingrinch a-runnin’ for president the same man who was in Congress back when Slick Willie was in office?” (The spelling error is intentional, because that’s how she pronounced it.)
I confirmed that he was, and she said, “If I recollect, wadn’t he the one who was run off by the other ‘Publicans for some sort of wrongdoin’?”
I told her he was, and gave her a few website archives after she wanted a refresher on the details of the wrongdoing. She said she didn’t have online access, but added, “I ain’t a-votin’ fer ‘im anyway. I don’t like that black feller, neither, but I’m a Dem’crat, and my husband would roll in his grave if I voted for a ‘Publican.”
People have also called to ask whether Mitt Romney sanctions multiple wives, since he’s Mormon, although “mainstream” Latter-day Saints long ago denounced plural marriage. Friday afternoon, I took a call from a self-described Republican man who said, “I been listenin’ to some of them debates, and that Santorum character, he soun’ lack a kook, doanee?”
I don’t feel qualified to answer such questions. These days, it’s a relief to get questions we once considered annoying, like, “What’s the weather tomorrow supposed to be like?” or “I sent in a thing six months ago about my kid gettin’ an award and was wonderin’, when did ya’ll run it?”
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m already looking forward to an end to this “insanity.” And in this case, I do consider myself qualified to render an opinion.
Kim Poindexter is managing editor of the Tahlequah Daily Press.
Columns
As political insanity tunes up, rational folks tune out
- Columns
-
-
Additional words in the Okie-fide lexicon
A few weeks ago, I wrote a column on what I call “Okiespeak.” I talked about some of the language peculiar to Okies, how we’re always “commencing” one thing or another, how we like to pair the adjective “plumb” with other words (as in “you’re plumb crazy, you know it?”) and how we refer to the rest of you as “y’all.”
-
High school twirlers, skimpy outfits and roaring fire batons
There were four former Fort Gibson High School twirlers at a reunion-ish event I attended a couple of weekends ago. If you’re more than a few years younger than I am, the word “twirlers” may give you pause. If so, you can be forgiven your ignorance, because for the most part, twirlers don’t exist anymore. I should know; I was one of them.
-
I done went and wrote a column about ‘Okiespeak’
I got into an argument with someone the other day about how to spell “y’all.” My opponent in the discussion insisted the apostrophe goes between the “a” and the first “l.” My position – the correct one, by the way – is that the apostrophe belongs safely ensconced right after the “y.”
-
Bombs and bears put a dent in slow news days
The way folks were congregating by NSU the other day, you’d have thought Sodexo was giving away free hot dogs, or campus police had cornered a Bigfoot and were trying to lure it into a cage with some beef jerky.
-
Healthy diets, sneak-eating, and porky preferences
A couple of years ago, I explained the phenomenon of “sneak-eating,” whereby the culprit waits until the backs of others in the household are turned, then gobbles down every preferred morsel in sight, and proceeds to cover his tracks by hiding wrappers and other evidence of the crime.
-
‘Devil’s food’: Nothing to do with chocolate cake
I’m not one to advance conspiracy theories, but in recent years, I’ve become convinced that certain edible items have been infused with drugs to induce craving.
-
‘Devil’s food’: Nothing to do with chocolate cake
I’m not one to advance conspiracy theories, but in recent years, I’ve become convinced that certain edible items have been infused with drugs to induce craving.
-
C&Es, children’s pageants, and mining for gold
When my siblings and I were kids, the only thing that would have kept us out of church was pole position at death’s door. I remember my father, the Baptist deacon, yelling on several occasions, “I don’t care HOW sick you are, YOU’RE GOING TO CHURCH!”
-
Believe it or not, I didn’t wind up an ‘old maid’
I’ve never had a teenage daughter. A son was bad enough, but boys don’t suffer the angst that infects every teenage girl. I speak as the voice of experience.
-
Cruising teenagers had their own set of weird rituals
My husband and I love mass transit. We’d even rather ride city buses than drive. It’s cheaper, you don’t have to worry about getting smacked by another driver, and you can mindlessly glaze over as someone else navigates through traffic.
- More Columns Headlines
-
Additional words in the Okie-fide lexicon



